banner











International Higher Education, Summer 1999
Higher Education Reform in Benin in a Context of Growing Privatization
Corbin Michel Guedegbe
Corbin Michel Guedegbe is a researcher in Benin. Address: BP 03-0688, Cotonou, Benin.


Over the last two decades, considerable progress has been made in expanding the knowledge base relating to the state of higher education in sub-Saharan Africa and of possible strategies and actions to improve its overall condition. This was facilitated by the numerous regional studies as well as diagnostic studies conducted at the country level. Nowadays, "revitalization" has become one of the most common and recurring themes in the literature concerning reform in higher education in the region and stands as the key strategy recommendation of the 1997 report prepared by the Association of African Universities and the World Bank.1 In line with this report, the February 1999 meeting of the Conference of Rectors, Vice Chancellors and Presidents of African Universities in Arusha, Tanzania, focused on the theme "Revitalizing Universities in Africa: Strategy for the 21st Century."
Despite the availability of a solid, relevant, and reliable information base on which reform could be founded, not much has happened, and the condition of African universities keeps worsening. This situation is mainly due to the fact that the solutions proposed by the several studies are not being (or cannot be) implemented because of an inability to take the necessary actions. The reasons accounting for this inability include:

  • the scope of the available information;
  • the lack of will to effect changes as a result of conservatism (resistance to change) and various nonacademic concerns;
  • a limited perception of the role of higher education in a country's development; and
  • the nature and scope of the solutions proposed, which are sometimes too ambitious for the limited resources available.

The inability to take necessary actions results from objective and subjective factors. Thus, it is necessary that effective policies should address both macropolicy issues regarding the relationship between higher education and development in general and internal questions specific to the institutions of higher education.
The recent "audit" (comprehensive review)2 of Benin's higher education system addresses these aspects. It analyzed the overall functioning of the university (structures, teaching, research, financial management, personnel management, and student services) as well as university relations to the state, and made recommendations for addressing the various issues. Among the external factors identified as working against higher education reform in Benin was the authorities' failure to reconcile a planned approach to higher education with the current liberal economic orientation. This method of initiating higher education reform is based on a comprehensive review. This is an approach most common in British Commonwealth countries and involves outside experts who periodically review all aspects of a higher education system or institution at the invitation of government.
The Background
The orientation of the socialist system of government in Benin, from the mid-1970s to the late 1980s, had a major impact on economic, political, and social life and particularly on the educational system, which underwent profound changes. Within the context of higher education reform initiated in the mid-1980s, a second group of institutions, called "professionalized schools or institutions" was established within the national university system. The declared objective of this planned approach was to adjust the training provided in higher education to the manpower needs of the country. The new types of entities included three integrated teacher training institutes and one advanced teacher training institute, which were to supply teachers for primary, junior secondary, and senior secondary institutions. As a result of the crisis of the late 1980s, the government could no longer guarantee jobs to all university graduates as before, which led to increasing graduate unemployment. The educational system suffered greatly from the situation since the government decided to close down the three above-mentioned teacher training institutes of the National University of Benin.
With the emergence of the democratic system of government, a free-market economy was established as opposed to the former state-planned socialist type. In the new context, private educational institutions including higher education ones flourished.
The Current Situation
At present, higher education in Benin is characterized by a rapid increase in the number of public and private institutions at all levels. In 1998 there were 27 authorized private higher education institutions totaling 16.72 percent of overall higher education enrollment, while no such institution existed in the early 1990s. The only teacher certification higher education institutions are not allowed to perform their function, which is essential to ensure quality teaching. Public higher education, which still has a leading role to play, is not responding to the needs of the other levels of the system because it is still suffering from past policies based on the planned approach. This was pointed out by the recent audit of public higher education.
What needs to be done?
Within the context of increasing demand for public education and of privatization of the educational services, there is an urgent need to get rid of all remnants of the past socialist philosophy that ensured public employment to all university graduates. In the coming years, public higher education will have to play a key role in the development of education not only in providing teachers to lower levels of the system but also in giving guidance and orientation to the emerging smaller private higher education institutions. Thus there is no longer any justification for closing down teachers colleges because jobs are no longer available in the public sector for graduates.
But to perform all these functions adequately, it is necessary that public higher education undergo profound changes as highlighted in the audit report. These changes are summarized in the 13 recommendations for reform proposed in the report, covering the following areas:

  • appointment mode for the rector;
  • composition of the university council and core commissions;
  • status and organization of the faculties;
  • accounts and budgets;
  • student flows and adjustment of resources on the basis of enrollments;
  • organization of teaching;
  • conditions and regulation of research;
  • personnel management and performance as a criterion for evaluation;
  • reorganization of the central administration;
  • academic structures;
  • organization of university libraries;
  • organization of student services (housing, transportation, catering, and health); and
  • scholarship allocation system.

The audit provided a solid information base as well as proposals for good decision making. However, the willingness to engage in reform remains a key factor to fight the "inability" to take necessary actions. Pressure from the emerging private higher education sector will certainly be a determining factor in initiating these much-needed reforms.
Notes

  1. Revitalizing the Universities in Africa: Strategy and Guidelines (Washingon, D.C.: World Bank, 1997).
The review was conducted by a team led by G. Verhaegen, former rector of the Université Libre de Belgique (Belgium).